sobrique: (Default)
[personal profile] sobrique
Can anyone see the catch with this package?
Seems cheaper than our current, offers more bandwidth and static IP (Which is what we need for a server we run)

Erm. So:

https://www.bethere.co.uk/broadbandoffice.do;

Date: 2008-04-13 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkgodfred.livejournal.com
Contention on LLU is a bit odd anyway.

The traditional cotention that you get quoted is related to the number of users sharing a Virutal Path through BT's ATM network.

Which LLU doesn't touch at all.

Which is why their packages don't talk about 20:1 and 50:1 or whatever contention. It's just not there and works in a completely different way.

Date: 2008-04-14 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jorune.livejournal.com
Is there any public site that might be used to compare against the BT records you are looking at? Some ready reckoner for expected levels of speed versus distance, post code or location?

Profile

sobrique: (Default)
sobrique

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728 293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 18th, 2026 03:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios