Justice and consequence

[sobrique]

There is no justice, only consequences for you actions.
Every choice you make has it's consequence, every action it's price.

Going to prison for a crime isn't justice, it's just a consequence of getting caught.

The laws exist from a consensus of right and wrong. Many are simply to provide a framework, a baseline of assumptions.
If you operate within the framework, and so does everyone else, then we have a society that works. Conformity is requisite, not because of 'Justice' but because otherwise society breaks apart.

Comments

[sobrique.livejournal.com]

The question always comes down to:
Do we imprison someone to punish them, or do we do it to make an example and to remove them from being 'on the street'.

Is there really something that a person can do that cannot be forgiven?

[xarrion.livejournal.com]

Global annihilation. But that gets philosophical - if there's no-one left to forgive, is the act unforgivable?

[the-wood-gnome.livejournal.com]

the thing about forgivness comes down to, who is the one forgiving and does the person being forgiven show remorse.

it's all well and good someone being forgiven by law, but if the family of those killed do not forgive the killer, is that person forgiven?

If the killer shows no remorse, how can they be forgiven anything. with no remorse they do not believe the action to be wrong.

[mavnn.livejournal.com]

But you can choose to forgive someone who shows no remorse - in fact you can still think it wise that they be removed from contact with society.