Justice and consequence
May. 27th, 2004 02:01 pmThere is no justice, only consequences for you actions.
Every choice you make has it's consequence, every action it's price.
Going to prison for a crime isn't justice, it's just a consequence of getting caught.
The laws exist from a consensus of right and wrong. Many are simply to provide a framework, a baseline of assumptions.
If you operate within the framework, and so does everyone else, then we have a society that works. Conformity is requisite, not because of 'Justice' but because otherwise society breaks apart.
Every choice you make has it's consequence, every action it's price.
Going to prison for a crime isn't justice, it's just a consequence of getting caught.
The laws exist from a consensus of right and wrong. Many are simply to provide a framework, a baseline of assumptions.
If you operate within the framework, and so does everyone else, then we have a society that works. Conformity is requisite, not because of 'Justice' but because otherwise society breaks apart.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 08:31 am (UTC)For myself the comment was more driven towards the outcome of the 'case'. If it could be shown to the courts satisfaction that a defendant will not re-commit the crime for which they are accused then should the court pass judgement?
The judgement will act to deprive the defendant of their liberty/property (custodial sentence/fine) and yet this person is not a criminal. I am concerned with the psychological state of defendants and their future actions. If a person has entered into a state of redemption than there is no need to punish a future self for their past actions.
Obviously this statement exists in a philosophical context and the phrase 'to the courts satisfaction' requires maguffin technology to be legally binding.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 10:02 am (UTC)Do we imprison someone to punish them, or do we do it to make an example and to remove them from being 'on the street'.
Is there really something that a person can do that cannot be forgiven?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 11:01 am (UTC)it's all well and good someone being forgiven by law, but if the family of those killed do not forgive the killer, is that person forgiven?
If the killer shows no remorse, how can they be forgiven anything. with no remorse they do not believe the action to be wrong.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 12:16 pm (UTC)