The value of a person
May. 26th, 2004 06:42 pmIf one starts from the assumption that in life there are people who are scum, and there are people who are saints.
The question is though, how do you measure a person?
Is it by their children?
By their impact on others?
By their wisdom and insight?
By their adherance to a moral code?
And another question:
[Poll #299286]
The question is though, how do you measure a person?
Is it by their children?
By their impact on others?
By their wisdom and insight?
By their adherance to a moral code?
And another question:
[Poll #299286]
no subject
Date: 2004-05-26 05:03 pm (UTC)eg. if the debate involved a technical scientific point and one argument came from someone with relevant experience and another from an environmental campaigner with a political agenda, I'd take all that information into consideration when determining what I thought about the issue.
Where there isn't that degree of technical ability required, I rate arguments on their merits, but I take into account what I know about the person behind the opinion when assessing the relative merits of the arguments.
And you, my love, need a lesson in apostrophe use.
It's is a contraction of 'it is', and is never used when you mean 'belonging to it', where the correct usage is 'its'.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 12:30 am (UTC)I thought I had that one pegged.
Ah well. (Goes and flicks through recent posts to find 'em)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 12:40 am (UTC)Unless you mean the poll, which sadly I can't edit :)