Coffee, Cutesy and TVs
Feb. 11th, 2004 03:44 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sobriqueYou'd have thought that someone who is in a 'technically demanding' profession like myself. You know, the kind where you do 'hot' upgrades on servers (that's changing bits, without actually shutting down or rebooting - it's quite a trick), or can figure out how to directly edit memory sectors on a workstation, or is responsible for high end disk storage arrays.
Anyway, you'd have thought that I could deal with the fucking coffee percolator, wouldn't you?
No.
So far, I've got about a 50% success rate when making brews. That's out of about 10 attempts.
I've so far:
Managed to pour cold water in it when it was still hot, thus blowing the release valve, letting water all over the floor.
Fail to rotate the spouty thing, so the water just got heated up, and poured straight back in the resevoir, and eventually just boiled dry.
Overfilled it, so the coffee grounds overflowed both into the 'clean' water resevoir clogging it up, and into the pot below.
Failed to put the pot in it properly, so the valve remained closed causing an overflow as above.
Sheesh.
Coffee with a sludge of grounds in the bottom, is an interesting experience. It's a bit of a gamble that you won't get a gob filled with sludge. Course, it's worth remembering that that sludge at the bottom is the really strong bit. I've got a bit of a coffee headache now... (yes, I got the sludge).
I'm now wrestling with the dilemma of holiday booking and real ale. I think shall opt for just several days off. Then again, it's been a bit feeble previous years, so maybe I'd better check out who's going first - after all, a pub session on a friday night is probably a good alternative. And if I'm going, and only going to get a few beers in, then I'll cope with going to work the next day.
Have you ever had something that really makes your teeth itch? I've realised that one thing that annoys me immensely is 'cutesy'.
There's two aspects:
Words, and deeds.
Words include using 'cutesy' variants - 'hewwo' instead of hello. "pubbage" instead of 'going to the pub', "chinky" instead of 'chinese', "fairy snow" instead of fair enough. I've now realised why. It's because this is the verbal equivalent of txt spk, or l33t.
The other that annoys me is 'acting cute'. You must have seen it. Mostly when couples are interacting, giggling at each other, and shying away, or perhaps on the odd occasion someone feels the need to jump up and down, whilst clapping and laughing.
I find this deeply annoying and offensive. You can get away with acting like you're a retard with a speech disorder if you're under 10 years old, or if you actually are a retard with a speech disorder. Not when you're 20+, male, have stubble, a university education and really should know better.
If you actually do fulfill the definition of 'cute' and are female, I'll typically let you get away with it. Not because it doesn't annoy me, but because a certain amount of leniency is permitted there.
(And should you actually fall into the category of "retard with with a speech disorder", I apologies for comparing you to cutesies)
I've also just had a debate with a collegue about TV. Well, not so much a debate, more an expression of their disbelief at the fact that I don't do television. They couldn't understand why we don't have one. Well, my counter argument is that the TV is a method of population control. Too often have I heard people organising their lives around what's on. For some, it's soap operas. For others quiz shows. For others, it's a running series. And of course, it's of crucial importance that it not be missed.
I don't like TVs. I don't like the way they encourage moronizing in front of them for hours of each day. I hate having my world drip fed to me on a broadcaster's schedule.
I use books and computers and radio for my sources of entertainment and information. Radio on the way to and from work, for my daily news fix. (Yes, it's radio 4. And if I were required to pay the license fee for radio, as used to be the case, I'd be content to do so, because the BBC is great - the radio and the website are without peer. And yes, this does mean TV watchers of the word subsidise my listening. I'm sure they'll cope ;p). Computers and books I read, because I find them more intellectually stimulating than TV. They're also interruptible, if I want to interact with someone.
And so, with my life I do things be it reading web forums, researching interests, or just reading some decent sci-fi books. I even play C&C generals, or the current favourite game for a bit of stress relief.
And I do roleplay games, which to my mind is a much more satisfying way of fulfilling the imagination.
I don't have my world shaped by what's on the TV. I find that the pace of many programs is wrong for me. Oft they're two slow, explaining stuff I already have at least some idea about, in words of single syllables. I'd much rather read about it, because then it's at _my_ pace.
Oh, and I've just spotted that one of my collegues has a copy of the The Haynes Baby Manual. This is so very wrong.
And a question for the day:
[Poll #247109]
(And please assume that the above lists all the available options - it being 'peak time' and so avoidance means careening onto a verge)
Anyway, you'd have thought that I could deal with the fucking coffee percolator, wouldn't you?
No.
So far, I've got about a 50% success rate when making brews. That's out of about 10 attempts.
I've so far:
Managed to pour cold water in it when it was still hot, thus blowing the release valve, letting water all over the floor.
Fail to rotate the spouty thing, so the water just got heated up, and poured straight back in the resevoir, and eventually just boiled dry.
Overfilled it, so the coffee grounds overflowed both into the 'clean' water resevoir clogging it up, and into the pot below.
Failed to put the pot in it properly, so the valve remained closed causing an overflow as above.
Sheesh.
Coffee with a sludge of grounds in the bottom, is an interesting experience. It's a bit of a gamble that you won't get a gob filled with sludge. Course, it's worth remembering that that sludge at the bottom is the really strong bit. I've got a bit of a coffee headache now... (yes, I got the sludge).
I'm now wrestling with the dilemma of holiday booking and real ale. I think shall opt for just several days off. Then again, it's been a bit feeble previous years, so maybe I'd better check out who's going first - after all, a pub session on a friday night is probably a good alternative. And if I'm going, and only going to get a few beers in, then I'll cope with going to work the next day.
Have you ever had something that really makes your teeth itch? I've realised that one thing that annoys me immensely is 'cutesy'.
There's two aspects:
Words, and deeds.
Words include using 'cutesy' variants - 'hewwo' instead of hello. "pubbage" instead of 'going to the pub', "chinky" instead of 'chinese', "fairy snow" instead of fair enough. I've now realised why. It's because this is the verbal equivalent of txt spk, or l33t.
The other that annoys me is 'acting cute'. You must have seen it. Mostly when couples are interacting, giggling at each other, and shying away, or perhaps on the odd occasion someone feels the need to jump up and down, whilst clapping and laughing.
I find this deeply annoying and offensive. You can get away with acting like you're a retard with a speech disorder if you're under 10 years old, or if you actually are a retard with a speech disorder. Not when you're 20+, male, have stubble, a university education and really should know better.
If you actually do fulfill the definition of 'cute' and are female, I'll typically let you get away with it. Not because it doesn't annoy me, but because a certain amount of leniency is permitted there.
(And should you actually fall into the category of "retard with with a speech disorder", I apologies for comparing you to cutesies)
I've also just had a debate with a collegue about TV. Well, not so much a debate, more an expression of their disbelief at the fact that I don't do television. They couldn't understand why we don't have one. Well, my counter argument is that the TV is a method of population control. Too often have I heard people organising their lives around what's on. For some, it's soap operas. For others quiz shows. For others, it's a running series. And of course, it's of crucial importance that it not be missed.
I don't like TVs. I don't like the way they encourage moronizing in front of them for hours of each day. I hate having my world drip fed to me on a broadcaster's schedule.
I use books and computers and radio for my sources of entertainment and information. Radio on the way to and from work, for my daily news fix. (Yes, it's radio 4. And if I were required to pay the license fee for radio, as used to be the case, I'd be content to do so, because the BBC is great - the radio and the website are without peer. And yes, this does mean TV watchers of the word subsidise my listening. I'm sure they'll cope ;p). Computers and books I read, because I find them more intellectually stimulating than TV. They're also interruptible, if I want to interact with someone.
And so, with my life I do things be it reading web forums, researching interests, or just reading some decent sci-fi books. I even play C&C generals, or the current favourite game for a bit of stress relief.
And I do roleplay games, which to my mind is a much more satisfying way of fulfilling the imagination.
I don't have my world shaped by what's on the TV. I find that the pace of many programs is wrong for me. Oft they're two slow, explaining stuff I already have at least some idea about, in words of single syllables. I'd much rather read about it, because then it's at _my_ pace.
Oh, and I've just spotted that one of my collegues has a copy of the The Haynes Baby Manual. This is so very wrong.
And a question for the day:
[Poll #247109]
(And please assume that the above lists all the available options - it being 'peak time' and so avoidance means careening onto a verge)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re:
Date: 2004-02-12 05:38 am (UTC)The _insulting_ part is the 'cutisfication' of the word (IMO). In much the same way as I'd be irritated by being called 'eddie poos', or similar.
The racial part, to my mind, it just 'common sense'.
I don't see being called a 'brit', a 'white', a 'caucasian', a 'chinese', a 'black' or anything else as offensive, since at the end of the day, they're not. They're just descriptions. Chinky I dislike, because it's a 'cutsy' word, and lacts dignity.
Or something.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-12 07:33 pm (UTC)If we do end up doing a chinese meal Saturday, then you are soooo *not* using that word. I don't want my meal flavored with spit, thank you very much... ;-)
Oh, And putting "age" on the end of words isn't Cute, it's "Language bit of brain not working properly" way to sum up longer sentances.... Is in my case anyway, and I belive I was one of the main people to use it. I am putting a concious effort not to now though....
Re:
Date: 2004-02-13 12:41 am (UTC)