Chain Letters
Jan. 17th, 2005 12:08 pmI hate chain letters.
The are evil.
I've just had one from someone, who's forwarded it to everyone in the company.
About a little girl in phuket who can't remember anything, and has lost her parents, with a photo attachment
I felt the need to reply:
"Tragic though it is, chain letters really don't help matters much. After all, this little girl has already been re-united with her family.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/tsunami/lostgirl.asp
Then if you take a 60kb chain letter, and multiply it by all the users in $COMPANY, being 55,000, you use up 3.5Gb of disk space, and the bandwidth necessary to transmit it.
The disk space (including backups) costs us around £600 per year.
The bandwidth would tie up the entirety of a 2Mb site internet connection for about 5 hours, slowing down all our other network traffic in the meantime.
This is leaving aside the cost of 55,000 employees each taking 30 seconds to stop and read this email, which works out at about 450 man-hours.
If they then send it on, then the problem multiplies."
Grr. Where's my LART.
Edit:
Have now had a response
"I'm sorry for wasting your time, this only came to me this morning and I didn't know she had been reunited with her family. But I would rather waste people's time than think it wasn't my problem.
Regards"
The are evil.
I've just had one from someone, who's forwarded it to everyone in the company.
About a little girl in phuket who can't remember anything, and has lost her parents, with a photo attachment
I felt the need to reply:
"Tragic though it is, chain letters really don't help matters much. After all, this little girl has already been re-united with her family.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/tsunami/lostgirl.asp
Then if you take a 60kb chain letter, and multiply it by all the users in $COMPANY, being 55,000, you use up 3.5Gb of disk space, and the bandwidth necessary to transmit it.
The disk space (including backups) costs us around £600 per year.
The bandwidth would tie up the entirety of a 2Mb site internet connection for about 5 hours, slowing down all our other network traffic in the meantime.
This is leaving aside the cost of 55,000 employees each taking 30 seconds to stop and read this email, which works out at about 450 man-hours.
If they then send it on, then the problem multiplies."
Grr. Where's my LART.
Edit:
Have now had a response
"I'm sorry for wasting your time, this only came to me this morning and I didn't know she had been reunited with her family. But I would rather waste people's time than think it wasn't my problem.
Regards"
no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 03:19 pm (UTC)On a related note, how are you supposed to educate your family about netiquette. My sister sent an email to several people (without using BCC) with a story attached. 80 lines of text in a word document, that had been pasted from an email that had been forwarded several times. This bloated it to 140 lines with little sodding chevrons all over the shop with some lines having just one word on them. Grr.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-17 10:58 pm (UTC)