Umm, AFAICS value includes quality eg. the thing which is the best value isn't usually the cheapest - it's generally mid-range and lasts for longer than average.
Yes, value and quality are linked. Cheapest is usually nastiest.
The question was mostly to see which end of the scale influences thinking - Dyson vacuum cleaners, for example, are really good IMO. But they're £200-300. Which means that you're 'average' vacuum cleaner at £50-80 which does the job, just maybe not as well would be the 'value' choice.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 07:42 am (UTC)The question was mostly to see which end of the scale influences thinking - Dyson vacuum cleaners, for example, are really good IMO. But they're £200-300. Which means that you're 'average' vacuum cleaner at £50-80 which does the job, just maybe not as well would be the 'value' choice.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 08:33 am (UTC)But the question stands, would you buy a dyson at £250 or a 'standard' at £80?
no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 10:20 am (UTC)I feel that value and value are part of the same thing, it all depends on what you are buying and who/what you are buying it for.
It's not as binary as that :)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 01:57 pm (UTC)Where did the discount come from?
no subject
Date: 2004-07-12 02:30 pm (UTC)The discount came because I used to work as a warehouse assistant for a heating and plumbing firm.
don't anymore so no more discount.