Protecting us from the terrorists.
Jan. 26th, 2010 07:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sobriqueIt's quite hard to argue, as a driver, that ANPR - automatic number plate recognition - is a bad thing. There's ... last I checked, about a million uninsured drivers on the road, and as someone who does pay for his (legally required) insurance, I find it irritating that I might end up with a claim because someone who wasn't insured drove into me.
But the thing is, that - like much of our surveillance tech - can do so much more. Intelligence gathering. Flagging 'suspects'. Catching people wanted for questioning.
It's much the same with the video cameras on the street - who _wouldn't_ want to be safer? Problem is, just because it was caught on camera, doesn't mean they know who did it. But it's all a bit better right? I mean, every little bit that helps the security services, the police or the benefits office catch benefit cheats ... that's all good right?
But the problem I have with it - and I've _always_ had with it - is that ... it presumes a trust in those in charge. It presumes that the person with the power, isn't going to abuse it.
Imagine a world, where the BNP start to win seats in local, European, and national elections. Imagine a world, where people who's political viewpoint you actively disagree with. They could quite well say, were they elected, they had a mandate to do all the things they bash on about - things I personally find distasteful, for all sorts of reasons.
Now imagine those really funky anti-terrorist, anti-fraud, anti- crime surveillance measures, and think to what uses they might be turned.
But the thing is, that - like much of our surveillance tech - can do so much more. Intelligence gathering. Flagging 'suspects'. Catching people wanted for questioning.
It's much the same with the video cameras on the street - who _wouldn't_ want to be safer? Problem is, just because it was caught on camera, doesn't mean they know who did it. But it's all a bit better right? I mean, every little bit that helps the security services, the police or the benefits office catch benefit cheats ... that's all good right?
But the problem I have with it - and I've _always_ had with it - is that ... it presumes a trust in those in charge. It presumes that the person with the power, isn't going to abuse it.
Imagine a world, where the BNP start to win seats in local, European, and national elections. Imagine a world, where people who's political viewpoint you actively disagree with. They could quite well say, were they elected, they had a mandate to do all the things they bash on about - things I personally find distasteful, for all sorts of reasons.
Now imagine those really funky anti-terrorist, anti-fraud, anti- crime surveillance measures, and think to what uses they might be turned.
