Keyboard layout is pretty nice, but I've just discovered it seems to be severely lacking a 'pipe' symbol. And a forward slash. These keys are apparantly just above 'carriage return' except on a UK keyboard, that key is #~ Which of course, makes stuff rather interesting. Do I switch to US, and have a load of stuff in the wrong place (I'm sorry, but " is shift-2 on _real_ keyboards) but get my |\ but have "@ and # in the wrong places.
Or do I just assume that it's on windows therefore it's for wordprocessing, not 'real' work (e.g. involving changing directory, or ... well almost any real unix command) and leave it as UK.
Decisions, decisions.
Or do I just assume that it's on windows therefore it's for wordprocessing, not 'real' work (e.g. involving changing directory, or ... well almost any real unix command) and leave it as UK.
Decisions, decisions.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 12:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 12:36 pm (UTC)Which is good, because I'd have to not use it otherwise, but is fine because I can get one with the right keyset.
Sigh, time to re-order.
(And curse thinkgeek for only stocking the one of them. I did check on the webshite, but didn't think to check on thinkgeek)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 12:38 pm (UTC)http://www.getdigital.de/index/0xdd
no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 12:41 pm (UTC)solution I used was to hold down alt and on the numeric keypad type 124
just tested it and it give you |
no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 01:26 pm (UTC)Grr.
Oh well, I'll use this one a while, e.g. until payday, and then buy a proper one if I still like it.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 01:26 pm (UTC)A lot of the UNIX admin's I know end up using the US layout anyway for whatever reason.
(mac's use a pseudo US layout with @ above 2 and # being alt-3 so that keeps me happy... while this layout seemed ridiculous at first I have to say it now makes sense to me).
For a non-microswitch keyboard I find the Das Keyboard an excellent choice.... not quite as nice as the original model-m I used to use but it gets the job done.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 11:35 pm (UTC)