The world is mad
Sep. 3rd, 2004 09:10 amA sign on a side of a building:
"Open for business as usual.
Sorry for any inconvenience."
Yahwhat? They're sorry because they're open?
Edit: Back by popular request:
The other thing that I saw recently that made me scream in horror was Low Carb Kit Kats
The EVIL Atkins fad is going too far. As an affirmed and dedicated fat bastard, I can tell you right now that they way to go about 'dieting' is to eat less pie.
NOT STUFF YOUR FACE WITH FUCKING KITKATS.
I don't care how low carb they are. You're still screwing up your biochemistry, and whilst it may result in weight loss, it will probably result in cholesterol, heart problems, high blood presssure, liver damage and amazingly stinky breath.
Simple maths really, of energy intake vs. energy usage:
Lose weight by:
Doing more stuff.
Eating less pies.
Doing more stuff will make you fitter, than eating less will. (although actually, I'm finding that doing more stuff is not really reducing weight, but it is reducing fat, which is good enough for me.)
I know Atkins is supposed to work by making you feel less hungry, but isn't that basically the same as "eating less"?
"Open for business as usual.
Sorry for any inconvenience."
Yahwhat? They're sorry because they're open?
Edit: Back by popular request:
The other thing that I saw recently that made me scream in horror was Low Carb Kit Kats
The EVIL Atkins fad is going too far. As an affirmed and dedicated fat bastard, I can tell you right now that they way to go about 'dieting' is to eat less pie.
NOT STUFF YOUR FACE WITH FUCKING KITKATS.
I don't care how low carb they are. You're still screwing up your biochemistry, and whilst it may result in weight loss, it will probably result in cholesterol, heart problems, high blood presssure, liver damage and amazingly stinky breath.
Simple maths really, of energy intake vs. energy usage:
Lose weight by:
Doing more stuff.
Eating less pies.
Doing more stuff will make you fitter, than eating less will. (although actually, I'm finding that doing more stuff is not really reducing weight, but it is reducing fat, which is good enough for me.)
I know Atkins is supposed to work by making you feel less hungry, but isn't that basically the same as "eating less"?
no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:32 am (UTC)Naa, thought it was mostly rubbish, to self-vetoed...
no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:44 am (UTC)*sulk*
your ventings and rantings are generally interesting and often rather amusing - please don't deprive us!
no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:56 am (UTC)OK, not _quite_ the original text, but ...
no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 03:43 am (UTC)But if you're trying to tell yourself that they're a 'positive part of your diet' then you're fucking deluded.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-03 11:11 am (UTC)The fact that my diet is bizzarre and not aimed at any self alteration in any way...
Just remember no diet = dead :)